V.Azhagamuthu, v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court received an additional affidavit confirming festival celebration between May 2-10, 2019 without issues. Court recorded this document and declined to pass further orders, closing the writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking temple car return and festival rights.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 18.12.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P.No.22624 of 2018
V.Azhagamuthu .. Petitioner ..Vs..
1.The District Collector, O/o. Perambalur District Collector, Perambalur District. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, H.R.&C.E. Department, Ariyalur ...Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to return back the new temple car (kovil ther) and provide rights over the new temple car (Kovil ther) to the Mariamman Koil celebration committee and permit to conduct the celebration of festival of Arulmighu Mariamman temple by the petitioner committee.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bharathy
For R2 : Mr.M.Maharaja
Special Government Pleader
(H.R.& C.E)
O R D E R
An additional affidavit has been filed along with supporting document stating that the festival had been celebrated between 02.05.2019 and 10.05.2019 without any problem among the village people. This additional affidavit is taken on file and recorded. Recording the same, no further orders are required in the Writ Petition and consequently the Writ Petition stands closed. No Costs.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an additional affidavit demonstrating the festival had been celebrated without problems necessitates a further order or defines the finality of the writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Azhagamuthu
- respondent
The District Collector, O/o. Perambalur District Collector
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner, H.R.&C.E. Department, Ariyalur
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court