Petitioner sought patta for a poromboke house but was told by the Tahsildar that the land falls under Ayanavaram jurisdiction. Court dismissed the petition, directing the petitioner to approach the Tahsildar, Ayanavaram for a hearing and detailed order.
Petitioner permitted to submit fresh representation to Tahsildar, Ayanavaram by 10.01.2020
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 18.12.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P.No.16646 of 2018
M.Sambandam
.. Petitioner
..Vs..
1.The Thasildar,
Perambur Taluk,
Chennai-600 011
2.The District Collector,
Chennai District,
Singaravelar Maligai,
2 nd line Beach, Chennai-600 001.
...Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st and
2 nd respondents to consider and pass order in petitioner
representation dated 03.03.2018.
For Petitioner :Mr.P.M.Manikannan
For R1 & R2 : Mr.N.Inbanathan
Addl.Govt. Pleader
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed the Writ Petition in the nature of mandamus directing the first respondent and second respondent to consider and pass orders in this representation dated 03.03.2018. The first respondent in the Writ Petitioner Tahsildar, Perambur Taluk. The petitioner states that he had been in possession of the Government poromboke house for the past five years. It is further stated that he is entitled for patta from the concerned Tahsildar. In this connection, he has submitted the representation on 03.03.2018
1/4
Ayanavaram. However, it would also be in the interest of the petitioner, if he would come with a fresh representation to the Tahsildar, Ayanavaram on or before 10.01.2020 and the said officer, may issue notice and offer personal hearing to the petitioner, and on examining the records, shall pass a detailed order on or before 28.02.2020.
3.In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of and the petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation to the Tahsildar, Ayanavaram on or before 10.01.2020 and upon receipt of the same, the Tahsildar, Ayanavaram, shall offer an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and after examination of the records, shall pass a detailed orders on or before 28.02.2020.
4.With the above observation, the Writ Petition stands
disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To,
1.The Thasildar,
Perambur Taluk,
Chennai-600 011
2.The District Collector,
Chennai District,
Singaravelar Maligai,
2 nd line Beach, Chennai-600 001.
3.The Tahsildar,
Ayanavaram.
+1cc to Mr.P.M.Manikannan, Advocate sr.105980
+1cc to Government Pleader SR.NO. 106282
W.P.No.16646 of 2018
rsv(co)
nr 28/01/2020
2/4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking patta for government poromboke house should be disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach the competent authority.
Whether the Tahsildar, Ayanavaram is the correct authority to consider the petitioner's representation.
M. Sambandam
The Thasildar, Perambur Taluk
The District Collector, Chennai District
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
