This disposal addresses a writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging the location of a proposed TASMAC shop alleging violation of maintenance of distance rules. The court noted that the proposal to locate the shop had been dropped during underlying proceedings, rendering no further order necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.07.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
W.P.No.21620 of 2017
R.Govindarajan .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Coimbatore District,
Coimbatore.
2. The District Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC),
Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.
3. The Commissioner,
Coimbatore Corporation,
Coimbatore.
4. The Tahsildar,
Coimbatore East,
Coimbatore. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing
the respondents 1 to 4 herein to dispose of the petitioner's
representation dated 29.05.2017.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents: Mr.E.Manoharan (For R1 & R4) Additional Government Pleader Mr.K.Sathish Kumar (for R2) Standing counsel for TASMAC Mr.K.Mahesh (for R3)
O R D E R (Order of this Court was made by S.Manikumar, J.)
No representation for the petitioner.
2017
---nfhak;g[j;J}u; khtl;lk;. nfhak;g[j;J}u; tlf;F tl;lk;. fhsg;gl;o fpuhkk;. fjt[ vz;/10-26A vDk; Kfthpapy; ,a';fp te;j muR kJghdf; fil vz; 1557 MdJ khepy beL";rhiyapy; 500 kPl;lUf;Fs; mike;Js;s fhuzj;jpdhy; 31/03/2017 ehspl;l cr;r ePjpkd;w jPu;g;g[iuapd;go ,f;filapid epWj;jk; bra;ag;gl;ljhy; murpd; tUtha; ,Hg;gpid jtpu;f;Fk; bghUl;L ,f;filapid nfhak;g[j;J}u; tlf;F tl;lk;. tpsh';Fwpr;rp fpuhkk;. jz;zPu; ge;jy; rhiy. g[y vz;/421-2 vd;Dk; ,lj;jpw;F ,lkhw;wk; bra;a cj;jput[ ntz;o ghu;it 2?y; fz;Ls;s Kd;bkhHpt[fs; tug;bgw;wij ghu;it 8 kw;Wk; 10y; fz;l khtl;l nkyhshpd; mwpf;iffspy; fl;ol chpikahsu; jpU/kzp vd;gtu; jw;nghJ lh!;khf; epWtdj;jpw;F ,lk; mspf;f rk;kjk; ,y;iy vd;W bjhptpj;Jtpl;ljhy; Kd;bghHptpid uj;J bra;J cj;jputpLkhW nfl;fg;gl;lij vw;Wf; bfhz;L khtl;l nkyhshpd; ghpe;Jiug;go uj;J bra;ag;gLfpwJ vdj; bjhptpf;fg;gLfpwJ/ Xk;- ? khtl;l Ml;rpaUf;fhf
Sd/Deputy Registrar(CJ.Conf) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
ars
To
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the location of a TASMAC shop should be allowed in view of the proposed proposal being rescinded.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
R.Govindarajan
The District Collector, Coimbatore District
The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation
The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation
The Tahsildar, Coimbatore East
S.Manikumar
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
