Dismissed

T.Thooyamani v. The District Collector

Madras HC3 Jul 2019WP/17480/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by R.Thooyamani against the District Collector and Divisional Engineer (NH) seeking disposal of representations and laying of a road without affecting a bore well was dismissed as infructuous. During further hearing, the petitioner submitted that the road had already been laid, rendering the prayer moot.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.

T.Thooyamani Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 03.07.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶6

W.P.No.17480 of 2017

¶7

R.Thooyamani .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur. 2. The Divisional Engineer (NH), National Highways Division, Coimbatore. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose the representation on 6.2.17 and 13.2.17 of the petitioner and to lay the road without affecting the Bore Well situated at Tiruppur - Dharapuram Highways Road, Kovilpalayam, Village.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rajkumar

¶9

For Respondents: Mr.E.Manoharan

¶10

Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.Richardson Wilson (for R2)

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

(Order of this Court was made by S.Manikumar, J.)

¶13

Petitioner has sought for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose of his representations dated 06.02.2017 and 13.02.2017 and to lay the road without affecting the Bore Well situated at Tiruppur - Dharapuram Highways Road, Kovilpalayam, Village.

¶14

On this day, when the matter came up for further hearing, Mr.D.Rajkumar, one of the learned counsel on record submitted that road has been laid and that the prayer sought for has

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶17

Placing on record the submission of the learned counsel on record, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs.

¶18

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶19

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The District Collector,
Tiruppur District,
Tiruppur.
2. The Divisional Engineer (NH),
National Highways Division,
Coimbatore.
+1cc to Mr.Richardson Wilson, Advocate Sr.55274
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.55944
W.P.No.17480 of 2017
nrl[co]
srg 14/08/2019

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Thooyamani v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Thooyamani v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.venkatesan Vs The District Collector

M.Kaliaperumal Vs The District Collector

D.Riyas Ahmed Vs The Secretary to Govt

The Caritas India, Vs Union of India

R.Govindarajan, Vs The District Collector

J.Ananda Jothi Vs The Secretary to Government