V.Rajee v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-paragraph order dismisses a writ petition under Article 226 declaring it infructuous as nothing survives in the matter, and also dismisses a connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
W.P.No.21271 of 2009
V.Rajee .. Petitioner
-vs-
1. The Commissioner
Civil Supplies
(Consumer Protection Department)
Chepauk
Chennai 600 005
2. The District Supply Officer
Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District .. Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the
respondents in any manner interfering with the supply of
Kerosene for the Registration Certificate No.44/77-78 (CGT).
For Petitioner :: Mr.P.Solomon Francis
For Respondents :: Mr.K.Ravikumar
Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ
petition may be dismissed as infructuous, as nothing survives in
the matter. Recording his statement, this writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2009 is also
dismissed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ss
To
- The Commissioner Civil Supplies (Consumer Protection Department) Chepauk Chennai 600 005
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Rajee
- respondent
The Commissioner Civil Supplies (Consumer Protection Department)
- respondent
The District Supply Officer Kanchipuram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court