The petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus treating her suspension period as duty with consequential benefits. The court dismissed the petition for default due to the petitioner's absence and failure to produce records proving departmental proceedings were dropped.
Writ petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.03.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
W.P.No.17836 of 2008
G.Uma
...Petitioner
Vs
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to treat the period of suspension between 18.02.2006 and 27.11.2007 as duty will all consequential benefits such as arrears of pay, re-fixation of pay and all other attendant benefits.
For 2nd Respondent : Mrs.Lita Srinivasan
For R3 : No Appearance
The Writ Petition has been filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to treat the period of suspension of the petitioner between 18.02.2006 and 27.11.2007 as duty will all consequential benefits such as arrears of pay, refixation of pay and all other attendant benefits.
was adjourned for more than three occasions at the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tsi To 1. The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 2. The Block Development Officer, Harur Panchayat Union, Dharmapuri District. +1 cc to The Government Pleader, Sr.No. 23177 W.P.No.17836 of 2008 SS(CO) CSL/23.04.2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging suspension order can be maintained without proof that departmental proceedings were dropped against the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Uma
The District Collector, Dharmapuri District
The Block Development Officer, Harur Panchayat Union
K.Chennammal Karunkannan
T.Raja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
