The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. Upon receiving the application and endorsement for withdrawal, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.No.20726 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
S.C.Arvind ... Petitioner
Vs 1.The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Police Station, Gudiyatham 632 602, Vellore District.
2.The Superintendent of Police, Chaduvacharri, Vellore District 632 009. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent not to interfere in any manner in the business of the petitioner in the running of the Airtel Coin Boxes at Shop No.37A, Gandhi Road, Nadupet, Gudiyatham.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.M.G.Ramakkannan
For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh,
Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
gsk
To
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 18254
W.P.No.20726 of 2011
RR(CO)
GN(29/03/2019)
S.C.Arind
The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Police Station
The Superintendent of Police, Chaduvacharri
V.Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
