Dismissed

Robust Hotels Private Limited v. Chennai Metropolitan Water

Madras HC25 Feb 2019WP/12957/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for water supply without a completion certificate. The respondent's counsel stated the petition had become infructuous due to subsequent developments. The Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Robust Hotels Private Limited Vs Chennai… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 25.02.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN

¶5

W.P.No.12957 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011

¶6

Robust Hotels Private Limited,
365, Anna Salai, Teynampet,
Chennai 600 018,
Rep by its Director,
Mr.A.Srinivasan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewage Board,
1, Pumping Station Road,
Chintadripet, Chennai 600 002.
2.The Area Manager – VIII,
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewage Board,
Muthukrishnan Street,
T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017.
3.Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA),
Gandhi Irwin Road,
Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... Respondents

¶7

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondent to provide water connection and supply in respect of the building at 365, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018 without insisting upon the production of the completion certificate.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.T.K.Bhaskar For Respondents: Mr.Jothikumar O R D E R

¶9

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that in view of the subsequent development during the pendency of the writ petition, nothing survives for further consideration in this writ petition.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

2. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶12

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)

¶13

//True Copy//

¶14

Sub Assistant Registrar
gsk
To
1.Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewage Board,
1, Pumping Station Road,
Chintadripet, Chennai 600 002.
2.The Area Manager – VIII,
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewage Board,
Muthukrishnan Street,
T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017.
3.Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA),
Gandhi Irwin Road,
Egmore, Chennai 600 008.
+1cc to the Government Pleader sr.18255
W.P.No.12957 of 2011
gp[co]
srg 02/04/2019

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Robust Hotels Private Limited v. Chennai Metropolitan Water

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Robust Hotels Private Limited v. Chennai Metropolitan Water

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Carborundum Universal Ltd. Vs The Special Joint Commissioner of Labour

P.Ramasamy, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

P.Senthil Kumar, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

R. Venu Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

S.C. Arvind Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Anbalagan Vs The Branch Manager