The writ petition for quashing a Labour Court award was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner, who failed to cite despite listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED: 15.02.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
WP.No.19590 of 2004
The Management,
Triplicane Urban Co-Operative Society, Rep.by its Special Officer, No.119, Big Street, Triplicane, Chennai – 600 005. ...Petitioner Vs
1.The Presiding Officer, II Additional Labour Court, City Civil Court Building, High Court, Chennai – 600 104.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus Certiorari, to call for the records connected with the impugned Award in I.D.No.588/1993 on the files of the first respondent (II Addl Labour Court, Madras) dated 16.06.2003 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents: Mr.K.M.Ramesh for R2 R1 – Court.
O R D E R
When the matter was listed on 08.02.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter came to be listed today, under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ebsi/hvk
To
WP.No.19590 of 2004
rrs 13/03/2019
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Management, Triplicane Urban Co-Operative Society, Rep.by its Special Officer
The Presiding Officer, II Additional Labour Court
B.Rajalakshmi
M.S. RAMESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
