Disposed

Kothandapani,S/o.Ganesan v. The District Collector

Madras HC10 Oct 2019WP/18279/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding patta issuance within eight weeks and to not interfere with the petitioner's possession during this period, closing the connected writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation within eight weeks; status quo maintained on possession.

Kothandapani,S/o.Ganesan Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 10.10.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶3

W.P.No.18279 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.29091 of 2019 Kothandapani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai, District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai, District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai, District. 4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai, District. ... Respondents

¶4

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2018 and issue Patta to the petitioner to an extent of 0.57 cents out of 1.76.5 Hectares of unassessed agricultural land in Survey No.19/2, situated at Kaveriyampoondi Village, Tiruvannamalai District within the time stipulated by this Court and further directing the respondents not to issue house site patta in favour of other members who are not in possession.

¶5

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Silambarasan For Respondents : Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate

¶6

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

The prayer sought for herein is for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2018 and issue Patta to the petitioner to an extent of 0.57 cents out of 1.76.5 Hectares of unassessed agricultural land in Survey No.19/2, situated at Kaveriyampoondi Village, Tiruvannamalai District within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court and further directing the respondents not to issue House site patta in favour of other members who are not in possession.

¶9

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been in possession of said land for over a period of thirty years and now, the respondents are seeking to disturb his possession without disposing of his representation or following any procedure known to law.

¶10

In view of the grievance expressed by the petitioner, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to dispose of the representation dated 17.04.2018 filed by the petitioner seeking patta within a period of eight weeks from the date of a receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the possession of the petitioner shall not be interfered with. Connected W.M.P. is closed.

¶11

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CJ Conf) //True copy//

¶12

Sub Assistant Registrar nsd/mtl

¶13

¶14

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai, District.

¶15

2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai, District.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai, District.

¶18

4.The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai, District.

¶19

+1cc to Mr .K.Silambarasan , Advocate SR.No.85573

¶20

W.P.No.18279 of 2018 VG I(CO) GMY(01/11/2019)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kothandapani,S/o.Ganesan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kothandapani,S/o.Ganesan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Anandan, Vs S.Natarajan

M.Ramasamy Vs N.Rajan

Munusamy Vs Kumari

S.Kumaran Vs The State of tamil Nadu

Godrej Properties Limited, Vs Accountant General (a and E)

M/s.Kawarlal and Co., Vs The Drugs Inspector