G.Anandan, v. S.Natarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a second appeal based on a compromise memo, the High Court of Madras disposed of the suit by confirming the parties' agreed terms without costs.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal disposed of in terms of the compromise memo filed by parties. Weak.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
S.A.No. 1073 of 2015 and
M.P.No. 1 of 2015
G.Anandan ..Appellant/Defendant
Vs.
S.Natarajan ..Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer: Memorandum of Second Appeal filed under Section. 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2014 made in A.S.No.41 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Vellore, Vellore District confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.04.2012 made in O.S.No. 120 of 2006 on the file of the Sub-Court, Vellore, Vellore District.
For Appellant : Mr. V. Perumal for T.Dhanyakumar For Respondent : Mr. B.R.Shankaralingam
J U D G M E N T
This Second Appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2014 made in A.S.No.41 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Vellore, Vellore District confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.04.2012 made in O.S.No. 120 of 2006 on the file of the Sub-Court, Vellore, Vellore District.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G. Anandan
- respondent
S. Natarajan
Coram
R. Subramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court