B.Kumar v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 filed by B.Kumar as infructuous, as the petitioner was dead. Consequential miscellaneous petition was also dismissed. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
W.P.No.21272 of 2009
B.Kumar ...Petitioner -vs1. The Commissioner Civil Supplies (Consumer Protection Department) Chepauk Chennai 600 005 2. The District Supply Officer Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents in any manner interfering with the supply of Kerosene for the Registration Certificate No.9/76-77 (CGT). For Petitioner :: Mr.B.Peter Francis For Respondents :: Mr.K.Ravikumar Additional Government Pleader ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous, as the petitioner is no more. Recording his statement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2009 is also dismissed. No costs. ss Sd/Deputy Registrar(C.S) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
To
- The Commissioner
Civil Supplies
(Consumer Protection Department)
Chepauk
Chennai 600 005
2. The District Supply Officer
Kanchipuram
Kanchipuram District
+1cc to the Govt.Pleader, Vide Sr.No.23197
W.P.No.21272 of 2009
Kak(09/04/2019)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.Kumar
- respondent
Commissioner Civil Supplies Chepauk Chennai
- respondent
District Supply Officer Kanchipuram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court