Sijo Jose v. The Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
WP filed seeking writ of mandamus to restrain police interference with business. Petitioner absent on hearing date; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
WP filed seeking writ of mandamus to restrain police interference with business. Petitioner absent on hearing date; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 16.12.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P.No.1778 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.1976 of 2019
Siji Jose .. Petitioner
..Vs..
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Erode,
Erode District,
Tamil Nadu.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Perundurai Police Station,
Erode,
Erode District. .. Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents, their men, agents from interfering with the peaceful conduct of business i.e cross massage the name and style of “DEW DROPS (KERALA AYURVEDIC & TAL SPA) at No.45/22, Pari Nagar, perundurai Road, Erode – 638 011.
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 02.12.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the case was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” on 16.12.2019.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vum
To
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Erode, Erode District.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Perundurai Police Station,
Erode, Erode District.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
Madras High Court,
Chennai.
+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 105792
W.P.No.1778 of 2019 and
W.M.P.No.1976 of 2019
A.SK(28/01/2020)
Siji Jose
The Superintendent of Police, Erode
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court