The High Court noted that the respondent no longer possesses the disputed land as it was sold to a third party. Consequently, the Court held that no further adjudication was required and dismissed the writ petition for claiming vacant possession.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 11.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.17524 of 2008
and
M.P.No.1 of 2008
Ms.Jamunadevi
.. Petitioner
Vs
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., No.1, Renganathan Garden, 11th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai - 40. .. Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to hand over the vacant possession of the 5 grounds of land in Survey No.14/1 leased out to them at Mannurpettai Village and pay damages as per the current market value till the hand over of the land.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Nister Hakee
For Respondent : Mr.O.R.Santhana Krishnan Central Government Standing Counsel
O R D E R
The prayer made in the Writ Petition is to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to hand over the vacant possession of the 5 grounds of land in Survey No.14/1 leased out to them at Mannurpettai Village, Chennai.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Insp.cell)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dh
+1cc to Mr.O.R.Santhana Krishnan, Advocate SR.No.47286
W.P.No.17524 of 2008
and
M.P.No.1 of 2008
PP(CO)
GMY(22/07/2019)
Ms. Jamunadevi
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
