Petitioner sought to quash proceedings and direct consideration for an LPG Distributorship. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to the petitioner's own endorsement accepting the prayer was unenforceable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 10.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.14777 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009
N.Venkatesan ..Petitioner
vs The Chief Area Manager, M/s.Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 500, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018 ..Respondent
Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in ref.No.CHAO/KMM/026, dated 27.06.2009 on the file of the respondent herein, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent herein to consider the application of the petitioner for LPG Distributorship at Kannamangalam at Thiruvannamali District.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan
For Respondent : Mr.P.N.Radhakrishnan ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pvs
To
The Chief Area Manager,
M/s.Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,
500, Anna Salai,
Teynampet,
Chennai 600 018
+1cc to Mr.P.N.Radhakrishnan, Advocate SR.No.46577
W.P.No.14777 of 2009
CP(CO)
GMY(02/07/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Venkatesan
The Chief Area Manager, M/s.Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
K.Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
