Allowed

C.Subramani v. The Managing Director

Madras HC18 Nov 2019WP/17050/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In W.M.P.No.16601 of 2019, Justice M. Dhandapani disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226. The petitioner sought a direction to the Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation to consider his representation for appointment as Superintendent (Legal). The court directed the respondents to consider the representation on merits and pass appropriate orders.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.04.2019 on merits and pass appropriate orders expeditiously.

C.Subramani Vs The Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.11.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

And

¶6

W.M.P.No.16601 of 2019

¶7

C.Subramani ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Managing Director,

¶10

Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (CBE) Ltd., Coimbatore, 37, Mettupalayam Road,

¶11

Coimbatore – 641 043.

¶12

2.The General Manager,

¶13

Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (CBE) Ltd., Coimbatore, Erode Region, 45, Chennimalai Road, Erode – 638 001. ... Respondents

¶14

Prayer:

¶15

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.04.2019 to appoint the petitioner to the post of Superintendent (Legal) / Senior Superintendent (Legal) as per the CSR (Common Service Rules) within stipulated time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Mohamed Abbas

¶17

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.04.2019 to appoint the petitioner to the post of Superintendent (Legal) / Senior Superintendent (Legal) as per the CSR (Common Service Rules) within stipulated time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

2.Heard the arguments advanced on either side.

¶20

3.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner joined service as Junior Assistant Trainee in the Dheeran Chinnamalai Transport Corporation, Trichy on 18.09.1987 and his service was regularized as Junior Assistnat with effect from 24.09.1988. Thereafter, the petitioner was posted as Assistant and Senior Assistant. The petitioner has completed B.L.Degree and has also completed Diploma in Labour Law. The next avenue of promotion available to the petitioner is Superintendent (Legal) / Senior Superintendent (Legal) as per the conditions stipulated in Common Service Rules. In this regard, the petitioner made representation dated 19.04.2019 to the respondents, however, the same has not yet been considered. Hence, this petition.

¶21

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that without going into the merits of the case, it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.04.2019 and to pass appropriate orders.

¶22

5.Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, I am inclined to issue direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.04.2019, on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible.

¶23

6.The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶26

//True Copy//

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

1.The The Managing Director,

¶30

Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (CBE) Ltd., Coimbatore, 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore – 641 043.

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2.The General Manager,

¶33

Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (CBE) Ltd., Coimbatore, Erode Region, 45, Chennimalai Road, Erode – 638 001.

¶34

+2cc to Mr.E.Mohamed Abbas, Advocate Sr.95704 +1cc to Mr.K.J.Sivkumar, Advocate Sr.95990

¶35

W.P.No.17050 of 2019
And
W.M.P.No.16601 of 2019
kk[co]
srg 16/12/2019

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Subramani v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Subramani v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Perumal Vs N.Manikannan

K.v.Santhosh Vs Union Of India

R.Sekar Daniel Vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport

R.Palanisamy Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

S.Valliammai, Vs Secretary to Government

V.Ravikumar Vs the Sub-Registrar