Petitioner sought a writ to quash a driving licence order and return the licence. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous and closed connected Proceedings.
Writ petition dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 16.08.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.16662 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
K.Ravikumar ... Petitioner ..Vs.. The Regional Transport Officer Chennai East Chennai-12. ... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent herein made in proceeding No. Na. Ka. 24560/A1/2011 dt 6.6.2011 and quash the same and direct the respondent to return the Driving Licence to the petitioner forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ganesan For Respondent : Mr.J.Ramesh Additional Government Pleader O R D E R
The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer in the Writ Petition has already became infructuous and he had also made an endorsement to that effect.
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
sk
To
The Regional Transport Officer Chennai East Chennai-12.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, Advocate SR.No.70247
W.P.No.16662 of 2011
K. Ravikumar
The Regional Transport Officer Chennai East
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
