Petitioner sought a writ to quash the cancellation of his document writer's licence and direct renewal. The writ was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel endorsed that the request had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 13.08.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.15163 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009
V.Sigamani
...Petitioner
Vs
Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent made in Re.No.9649/S2/07, dated 29.05.2008, cancelling the document writer licence of the petitioner which has been confirmed by the first respondent in G.O. (T) No.160, Commercial Taxes (M) Registration (M-2), Department dated 09.04.2009 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents to renew the licence of the petitioner as per law.
For Petitioner : M/s.A.Arulmozhi For Respondents : Mr.P.P.Purushothaman, G.A.
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
spd(co) aa23/09/2019
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Sigamani
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Additional Registrar of Chits
The Inspector General of Registration
The District Registrar, Thiruvannamalai
The Sub Registrar, Polur
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
