A writ petition seeking quashing of an enquiry notice filed under Article 226 was dismissed as infructuous, as the first respondent had already passed final orders on the matter prior to the hearing.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.18124 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 07.08.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.18124 of 2009
and M.P.No.1 of 2009
K.Lakshmi ...Petitioner
Vs
1. Revenue Divisional Officer,
Cuddalore,
Cuddalore District.
2. Ilam Paruthi
3. Pavadai Kounder ..Respondents
Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records and quash the proceedings of the 1st respondent in his Na.Ka.No.A3-1449-2009, dated 14.07.2009.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gururaj For Respondents : Mr.B.Anand, G.A., for R1 Mr.M.S.Subramanian, for R2 No Appearance, for R3
1/ 3
W.P.No.18124 of 2009
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the enquiry notice issued by the first respondent, directing the parties to appear for enquiry on 25.07.2009.
07.08.2019 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking/ Non Speaking Order pvs To Revenue Divisional Officer, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.
2/ 3
W.P.No.18124 of 2009
K.KALYANASUNDARAM.J.
pvs
W.P.No.18124 of 2009
07.08.2019
3/ 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of proceedings became infructuous due to the issuance of final orders.
K. Lakshmi
Revenue Divisional Officer, Cuddalore
Ilam Paruthi
Pavadai Kounder
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
