V. Natarajan v. the Asst. Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner failed to appear after multiple adjournments. The Court treated the absence as a lack of interest and dismissed the Writ Petition for default.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition is dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.03.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
W.P.No.14337 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009
V.Natarajan ...Petitioner
Vs
- The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Coimbatore.
- The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Mariammal Vinayagar Tirukoil, Pitchampalayam, Tirupur Taluk, Tirupur District. ... Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for records of the 1st respondent order in NADA NA.KA4012/2006/A46 dated 05.06.2009 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Maharaja, Spl. Govt. Pleader O R D E R
The Writ Petition has been filed, challenging the correctness of the 1st respondent order in NADA NA.KA4012/2006/A46 dated 05.06.2009, thereby appointing the Executive Officer of Arulmigu Mariammal Vinayagar Tirukoil, Pitchampalayam, Tirupur Taluk, Tirupur District, the 2nd respondent herein as a fit person to perform the daily poojas etc., and to quash the same.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Natarajan
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Coimbatore
- respondent
The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Mariammal Vinayagar Tirukoil, Pitchampalayam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court