Dismissed

R. Ravindranathan Daily v. Secretary to Government of

Madras HC25 Mar 2019WP/13133/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ to quash an order delaying regularization of his services in the Pondicherry Legislative Assembly. During hearing, the respondent submitted medical evidence proving the petitioner expired on July 2, 2018, rendering the petition infructuous and resulting in its dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous due to the death of the petitioner on 02.07.2018.

R. Ravindranathan Daily Vs Secretary to… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:25.03.2019

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

The Honourable Mr. Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶5

Writ Petition No.13133 of 2006 and W.P.M.P.No.14722 of 2006

¶6

R.Ravichandranathan ... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Secretary to Government of Pondicherry for
DP & AR,
Chief Secretariat, Pondicherry.
2.The Secretary to Government, Legislative Assembly
Secretariat, Pondicherry.
3.The Editor of Debates,
Legislative Assembly Secretariat,
Pondicherry. ...Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to
call for the records of the 3 rd respondent with
No.6895/LAS/Estt./E2/94 dated 21.04.2006 and to quash the same
and consequently to direct the respondents to reinstate the
petitioner and regularise the services of the petitioner with
all other consequential benefits with effect from 08.11.2000,
the date on which the juniors of the petitioner have been
regularised.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ajayakumar
For Respondents : Mr.A.V.Ramalingam
Addl. Government Pleader (Puducherry)
O R D E R

¶7

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 3^rd respondent with No.6895/LAS/Estt./E2/94 dated 21.04.2006 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner and regularise the services of the

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

petitioner with all other consequential benefits with effect from 08.11.2000, the date on which the juniors of the petitioner have been regularised.

¶10

2.At the hearing today, the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents handed over the communication dated 21.03.2019 stating that the petitioner R.Ravindranathan, Daily Rated Casual Labourer of the Pondicherry Legislative Assembly Secretariat expired on 02.07.2018 and the newspaper clipping in regard to the obituary of R.Ravindranathan is enclosed.

¶11

3.In view of the above facts, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is dismissed.

¶12

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kal
To
1.The Secretary to Government of Pondicherry for
DP & AR,
Chief Secretariat, Pondicherry.
2.The Secretary to Government, Legislative Assembly
Secretariat, Pondicherry.
3.The Editor of Debates,
Legislative Assembly Secretariat,
Pondicherry.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 28350
Writ Petition No.13133 of 2006
and
W.P.M.P.No.14722 of 2006

¶13

SKV(CO) GN(26/04/2019)

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R. Ravindranathan Daily v. Secretary to Government of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Ravindranathan Daily v. Secretary to Government of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Venkatesan, Vs the Principal Chief Conservato

M/S. Gopi Engineering Works Vs the Joint Commissioner of

B.Murty, Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport

A. Arumugam Vs the Presiding Officer

G.R.Thangamaligai Private Vs Employees State Insurance

G.R.Thangamaligai Private Vs Employees State Insurance