B.Amirtham, v. the Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners requested liberty to file a fresh application for planning permission after writ petition disposal due to rejection of original application years prior; court granted liberty and disposed of the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to petitioners to file fresh application; writ petition disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.08.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.12757 of 2011 And M.P.No.3 of 2011
1.B.Amirtham
2.B.Karthikeyan ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.The Director,
Town and Country Planning,
807, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.
2.The Madurai City Municipal Corporation,
Rep. by its Commissioner,
Alagar Kovil Road, Madurai. ... Respondents
Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in proceeding Na.Ka/9862/10 P.A.1 dated 14/06/2010 and the consequential proceedings of the 2nd respondent in NE5/04442/11 dated 16/05/2011 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction and to further direct the 2nd respondent to grant approval for construction of residential building to the petitioner for his property situate at 33 & 33A, Sivaganga Road, Sathamangalam, Ward No.VII, Madurai.
For Petitioners : Mr.V.Raghavachari
For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh for R1
Additional Government Pleader Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari for R2 Additional Government Pleader
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B. Amirtham
- petitioner
B. Karthikeyan
- respondent
The Director, Town and Country Planning
- respondent
The Madurai City Municipal Corporation
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court