Dismissed

M.Nagalingam v. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests

Madras HC26 Jun 2019WP/11280/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking mandamus to direct the Appellate Authority to dispose of an appeal promptly. Noting the matter was referred back to the State Level Committee by the Appellate Authority on 22.11.2017 due to guideline amendments, the court held no issue remained to be adjudicated. No costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is disposed of without costs and the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

M.Nagalingam Vs The Principal Chief Conservator of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 26.06.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

W.P.No.11280 of 2019

¶6

and W.M.P.No.11634 of 2019

¶7

M.Nagalingam

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Versus 1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, (Head of the Department) Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

¶10

2.The Ministry of Environment Forests & Climate Change Regional Office (South Eastern Zone) 1^st & 2^nd Floor, HEPC Building, No.34, Cathedral Garden Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

¶11

3.The District Forest Officer, Vellore District.

¶12

4.The Forest Range Officer, Odakathur Forest Range, Odakathur – 632 103. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose of the appeal in F.No.11.6/F(C)A/WBIA/ROSEZ/TN/2017/1693, filed against the decision made by State Level Committee held on 06.07.2017 by first respondent within a stipulated time.

¶14

For Petitioner : Ms.G.Uma Maheswari

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.S.V.Vijay Prasanth

¶16

for R1, R3 & R4 Addl. Government Pleader. Mr.K.Gunasekar for R2 Senior Panel Central Government Counsel

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Pursuant to the notice issued to the respondents, today the learned standing counsel for the respondents produced the proceedings of the Appellate Authority passed on 22.11.2017, wherein, the matter has been referred back to State Level Committee (SLC) to review the decision.

¶20

In the light of the amendment to the Wood Based Industries (WBI) guidelines, 2017, the said order has been passed on 22.11.2017, by the Appellate Authority.

¶21

2.Recording the same, nothing survives in this Writ Petition and the same is disposed of. No cost. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

¶22

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
arb/rpl
To
1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
(Head of the Department)
Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet,
Chennai – 600 015.
2.The Ministry of Environment Forests & Climate Change
Regional Office (South Eastern Zone)
1 st & 2 nd Floor, HEPC Building,
No.34, Cathedral Garden Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
3.The District Forest Officer,
Vellore District.
4.The Forest Range Officer,
Odakathur Forest Range,
Odakathur – 632 103.
+1 CC to Mr.S.Veeraraghavan, Advocate sr 53183.
+1 CC to Mr.K.Gunasekar, SPCG, Advocate sr 53101.
+1 CC to Spl. Govt. Pleader(F) sr 53064.

¶23

W.P.No.11280 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.11634 of 2019

¶24

SP(23/07/2019)

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Nagalingam v. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Nagalingam v. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anjalidevi, Vs The Correspondent

S.Ravi, Vs The Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies

K.Anbazhagan Vs The Union of India

R.Pandian Vs The Dean

M/s.Gems B School Vs The Controller of Examination

K.Sivakumar Vs Southern Regional Power Committee