3.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner joined the respondents Corporation as Driver in the year 1990 and made permanent in the year 1991. The petitioner suffered severe pain and suffering in his spinal cord and he was admitted in the hospital on 17.02.1997 and underwent surgeries. He was discharged from the hospital on 28.02.1997. Due to pain, he could not do the work as driver. Therefore, he made a request to provide him suitable alternative employment. The 3rd respondent by his letter dated 21.01.2014 referred the petitioner to the 4th respondent to examine his fitness. Based on the said letter, the petitioner appeared before the Medical Board and medical report was sent to the 1st respondent on 18.02.2014 stating that the petitioner was unfit to do the work as driver. Thereafter, the petitioner was given the work of Security Guard till 12.10.2018. However, the petitioner was not given the light work of Security Guard from 13.10.2018 and he was orally directed to go on line and work as a driver. Therefore, the petitioner has made a representation dated 15.10.2018 to the 1st respondent to provide him the same light work of Security Guard. Since there is no response, the petitioner has again made a representation dated 21.12.2018 requesting them to refer the petitioner to the Medical Board to find out his fitness for the post of driver and provide him the same light work. After receiving his second representation, the petitioner was given light work orally with effect from 25.12.2018 and was informed that he would be given that work only for one month. Hence, this writ petition.
