Petitioners sought mandamus for appointment or payment of remuneration under the Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Act. Petitioners withdrew the writ petition, resulting in its dismissal.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P. No.10405 of 2011and M.P.No.1 of 2011
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to appoint the writ petitioners on a regular basis or in the alternative direct the respondents to pay them the remuneration as proposed by the 2nd respondent vide his letter Na.Ka.761/2010/A-1/Dt 29.9.2010 to the 1st respondent.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Balu
For Respondents : Mr.M.Maharaja
Special Govt. Pleader [R1]
Mr.M.Sundar [R2]
Mr.S.Subbiah [R3]
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made
an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by
the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrp
To
1. The Special Commissioner and Commissioner,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Department,
Chennai – 600 034.
W.P. No.10405 of 2011
rgn[co]
srg 07/01/2020
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Chandran and others
State of Tamil Nadu and others
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
