T.v.Prabhakar v. C.M.W.S..S.B
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition challenging a recruitment panel was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioners had attained superannuation by the time of the hearing. No costs were awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.10.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
W.P. No.10271 of 2005 and W.P.M.P. No.11170 of 2005
1.T.V.Prabhakar 2.A.Mani 3.S.Ravichandran 4.K.Jaganathan 5.R.Karupaiah 6.V.Manimaran 7.V.V.Sethuraman ... Petitioners Vs. 1.Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, rep. by its Board of Directors, No.1, Pumping Station Road, Chindatripet, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, No.1, Pumping Station Road, Chindatripet, Chennai – 600 002. 3.P.Krishnamurthy, Executive Engineer, Office of Construction Water Supply, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, No.1, Pumping Station Road, Chindatripet, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the concerned records from the 1st respondent, quash the Agenda No.28, Resolution No.49 of 2005 passed in the 257th meeting of Board of Directors of CMWSSB held
on 10.03.2005 in so far approving the panel for the post of Superintending Engineer for the year 2004-2005 (Civil/Mechanical and Electrical) by including the name of 3rd respondent viz, P.Krishnamurthy and consequently direct the respondent No.1 and 2 to take decision on the report submitted by the ''Committee on Segregation of Post for Civil/Mechanical and Electircal Engineers''.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.V. Prabhakar and Ors.
- respondent
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board
Coram
M. Duraismamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court