The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ appeal challenging an order dated 12.07.2019 in an earlier writ petition. The legend suggested the appeal was disposed of due to the alleged admission to pay the electricity amount by the petitioner.
The Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.10.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
W.A.No.3484 of 2019 and C.M.P.Nos.22317 & 22319 of 2019
P.Kesavan, (Enjoyer), Sembampalayam, M/s.Venkateswara Traders, Karunanoor, Ramapuram, Mallasamudram, Namakkal District. ... Appellant/Petitioner Vs 1.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep. by its Chairman, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. 2.The Superintending Engineer, Namakkal Electricity Distribution Centre, Namakkal.
3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mallasamudram, Namakkal District 637 503. .. Respondents
PRAYER : Appeal against the order dated 12.07.2019 passed in W.P.No.11189 of 2010 on the file of this Court.
Prayer in W.P.No.11189 of 2010: writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 3rd respondent in his letter No.AEE/O&M/MSM/CI/F-Theft/D279/10-11 dated 15.05.2010 and to quash the same and consequently directing the 3rd respondent to restore the service connection S.C.No.185-00-3-634/IIIB, in SF.No.162/2B, M/s.Venkateswara Traders, Ramapuram, Thiruchengode, Namakkal District.
For Appellant : Mr.K.Vellayaraj For Respondents : Mr.S.K.Rameshuwar Standing counsel for TNEB
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J)
The Writ Appeal has been filed against the order passed in W.P.No.11189 of 2010 dated 12.07.2019 on the file of this Court.
2.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that the learned single Judge has observed as if the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner admitted to pay the amount, whereas no specific admission was made by the petitioner before the learned single Judge. If that is so, it is always open to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant to file a Review Petition before the learned single Judge, either to expunge or remove the said remarks.
3.Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sai To
1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.
2.The Superintending Engineer, Namakkal Electricity Distribution Centre, Namakkal.
3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mallasamudram, Namakkal District 637 503.
+1 cc to Mr.V.K.Raj Law Chambers, Advocate, S.R.No.88000
W.A.No.3484 of 2019
BR(CO) SSM(22/10/2019)
P. Kesavan
The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
State of Tamil Nadu
N. Kirubakaran
P. Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
