Palani(Died) v. Pappa
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal by defendants challenging a decree for declaration and recovery of possession. The High Court held all questions were factual in nature, dismissing the appeal and confirming the lower courts' judgment.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed; judgment and decree of A.S.No.160 of 2004 and O.S.No.615 of 1995 confirmed.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.68 of 2009
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
RESERVED ON : 30.08.2019 DELIVERED ON : 15.11.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI
S.A.(MD)No.68 of 2009
- 1.Palani (Died)
- 2.Ponnammal
- 3.Easwari
- 4.Kaliammal
- 5.Krishnamoorthy
6.Valliammal .. Appellants/Appellants/Defendants 1 and 2
(Appellants 3 to 6 are brought on records as legal heirs of the deceased first appellant as per order dated 19.12.2018 in C.M.P.(MD)No.11659 of 2018 in S.A.(MD)NO.68 of 2009 by RTJ)
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Courts below rendered a perverse finding that the plaintiff was not the wife of the deceased Maruthai.
Whether there was an error in law in granting a decree for recovery of possession to the purchaser.
Whether the Courts below erred in law in holding that the sale deed dated 12.10.1990 was not binding on the plaintiff.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Palani
- appellant
Ponnammal
- respondent
Pappa
- respondent
Chittu Ammal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court