claimed that he and his predecessors in interest are in the possession and enjoyment of the suit property for several years, other than Exs.A1 to A3, no other document had been produced by the plaintiff to sustain the abovesaid case put forth by him in the plaint. The plaintiff examined as PW1, during the course of his evidence, stated that he has been enjoying the suit property for 30 years by paying kist and the patta in respect of the suit property was in the name of his father and thereafter, changed in his name and that he has not produced the patta in the name of his father. Furthermore, he would also admit that he has put up a shed in the suit property and claimed that it is he who had been in the possession and enjoyment in the suit property by paying tax to panchayat and further stated that he has not filed any tax receipts in the Court. Furthermore, the plaintiff would also claim that he has obtained the patta in his name prior to 2007 and the same has been given to his Advocate and the said patta stands in his name, however, as put forth by the plaintiff during the course of his evidence, he has not endeavoured to produced the patta standing in the name of his father, the patta obtained by him and standing in his name and also not filed any kist receipts evidencing his possession and enjoyment of the suit property for several years and there is no evidence for the alleged possession and enjoyment of the shed said to have been put up by him in the suit property.
