Jesudas v. R.Soundararajan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was disposed of by upholding a compromise settlement between parties. The court accepted the memorandum of compromise filed by appellants and respondents 1 and 2.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal disposed of in terms of the memorandum of compromise filed by the parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.07.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A. No. 720 of 2019 and CMP No.13776 of 2019
Jesudas ...Appellant/1st Respondent/1st Defendant Vs. 1. B.Soundararajan ..1st Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff 2. Vanitha Soundararajan ..2nd Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff 3. M/s. Alonkar Builders, Rep by its Proprietor Mr.Ramesh Ramanathan, Having their registered Office at No.49, Indra Nagar 1st Avenue, Indra Nagar, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020. .. 3rd Respondent/Appellant/2nd Defendant
Prayer:- Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 13.11.2018 made in A.S.No.12/2018 on the file of XV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai reversing the judgment and decree dated 21.06.2016 made in O.S. No.4026 of 2013 on the file of the XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr. K.Venkatasubban
For Respondents: Mr. N.Nagu Sah
Both Counsel present.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jesudas
- respondent
B.Soundararajan
- respondent
Vanitha Soundararajan
- respondent
M/s. Alonkar Builders
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court