1 and 2 to receive the balance sale consideration and execute the sale deed. The plaintiff has failed to establish that she had been orally requesting the defendants 1 and 2 to execute the sale deed in her favour and complete the sale transaction. Thus, it is found that absolutely there is no material evidencing the readiness and willingness on the part of the plaintiff in obtaining the relief of specific performance. Furthermore, the suit itself has come to be laid only in the year 2012, therefore, it is found that at the fag end of the stipulated period, the plaintiff has levied the suit for obtaining the relief of specific performance. Why the plaintiff has not endeavoured to enforce the sale agreement from the inception of the sale agreement till the laying of the suit, there is no proper explanation on the part of plaintiff, particularly, considering the position that only a sum of Rs.5,000/- remains to be paid for completing the sale transaction. Thus, as rightly found and determined by the first appellate Court, absolutely there is no readiness and willingness on the part of the plaintiff in seeking and obtaining the relief of specific performance and the abovesaid sine qua non factors for obtaining the equitable relief of specific performance, the same being completely absent in the present case, the first appellate Court is wholly justified in negativing the same and no interference is warranted with reference to the same.
