K.Srinivasan, v. Natesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the second appeal for non-prosecution after the appellant failed to appear on two listed dates, and dismissed a connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution with costs; connected miscellaneous petition dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.06.2019 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A. No. 54 of 2016
and
CMP. No.1396 of 2016
K. Srinivasan ...Appellant
Vs.
1. Natesan
2. Prakash
3. Krishnamoorthi
4. Ponnammal ...Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil
Procedure Code against the judgment passed in A.S.No.35 of 2014
on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Cheyyar, dated 12.10.2015
reversing the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.258 of 2010
on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Cheyyar,
Thiruvannamalai District dated 23.04.2014.
For Appellant : No appearance
For respondents: Mr.B.Jawahar
JUDGMENT
This matter was listed on 24.06.2019 and on that day, there was no representation for the appellant, despite the matter being called twice. On the appellant being called and remaining absent, the Registry was directed to list the matter on 25.06.2019 under the caption "for dismissal".
- Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent. Counsel for the respondents present.
- In the light of the above position, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution with costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Srinivasan
- respondent
Natesan
- respondent
Prakash
- respondent
Krishnamoorthi
- respondent
Ponnammal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court