15.The sale agreement is dated 11.09.2009. As per the terms of the sale agreement, the parties had agreed that the plaintiff should pay the balance sum of Rs.50,000/- within three years to the defendant and complete the sale transaction. As rightly found by the trial Court, there is no plausible explanation on the part of the plaintiff as to why the period of three years has been fixed for completing the sale transaction. With reference to the same, there is no explanation whatsoever offered by the plaintiff. Though he would claim that only at the instance of the defendant, the period of three years has been fixed for the payment of Rs.50,000/-, however, in the sale agreement, no such reason has been furnished that only at the instance of the defendant, the period of three years had been agreed for the payment of the balance sum of Rs.50,000/-. Therefore, on the face of it, the fixation of the period of three years as the outer limit for the payment of balance sum of Rs.50,000/- and completion of the sale transaction raises a doubt regarding the sale agreement as such. Be that as it may, the plaintiff, in any event, should be always ready and willing to perform his part of the contract right from the inception of the sale agreement and endeavour to pay the balance sum to the defendant at the earliest point of time and call upon the defendant to execute the sale deed as promised by him. On the other hand, though the sale agreement had come to be executed on 11.09.2009 as regards the case of the plaintiff that he had been always ready and willing to perform his part of the contract
