Ganapathi v. Sasikala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the second appeal by passing a decree in terms of the joint memo of compromise filed by the appellant and respondent on a specific date.
What did the court decide?
Passing of a compromise decree based on the joint memo of compromise filed by the parties; the appeal is disposed of with no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 11.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Second Appeal No.483 of 2008
V.Ganapathy ...Appellant
S.Sasikala
Prayer:Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2005 passed in A.S.No.55/2004 on the file of Sub Court, Tirupattur Vellore District reversing the judgment and decree dated 29.10.2004 passed in O.S.No.19/2004 and prays for setting aside the same.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Muniratnam
For Respondent : Mr.P.S.Kothandaraman
JUDGMENT
The second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2005 passed in A.S.No.55/2004 on the file of Sub Court, Tirupattur, Vellore District reversing the judgment and decree dated 29.10.2004 passed in O.S.No.19/2004 and prays for setting aside the same.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should be disposed of based on the parties' joint memo of compromise.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V. Ganapathy
- respondent
S. Sasikala
Coram
N. Sathish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court