This civil revision petition was dismissed as infructuous because the connected second appeal in the underlying suit was closed as settled out of court, rendering the challenge to the contempt order devoid of merit.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.R.P.(NPD)NO.1032 OF 2006 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2006
Paramasivam .. Petitioner
versus
Pappathiammal .. Respondent
PRAYER:
Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of
the Constitution of India, against the order dated 27.03.2006
made in I.A.No.4 of 2005 in Contempt OP No.3 of 2004 in
O.S.No.121 of 1999 on the file of the learned District Munsif,
Sirkali.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rajagopal
For Respondent : Mr.S.Sounthar
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 27.03.2006 made in I.A.No.4 of 2005 in Contempt OP No.3 of 2004 in O.S.No.121 of 1999 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Sirkali.
Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sri
To
The District Munsif,
Sirkali.
C.R.P.(NPD)No.1032 of 2006
and M.P.No.1 of 2006
BS(CO)
CS/24/04/2019
Paramasivam
Pappathiammal
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
