K.Samuvel v. B.Ponna Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
This Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution after parties failed to appear on the listing date, resulting in closure of the connected miscellaneous petitions.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
S.A.No.447 of 2014
and
M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014
1. K.Samuvel
2. Jothi .. Appellants/Defendants
Vs.
B.Ponna Rao .. Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against
the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2013 in A.S.No.43 of 2011 on
the file of the learned V Additional Judge (In-charge),
Additional District Court, City Civil Court, Chennai affirming
the judgment and decree dated 11.03.2010, in O.S.No.3980 of 2007
on the file of the learned XII Assistant Judge, City Civil
Court, Chennai.
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondent : No appearance
J U D G M E N T
Since there was no representation for the appellants when
the matter was listed on 13.11.2019, the matter was posted under
the caption 'for dismissal' today. Even today, none appears for
the appellants.
2. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions
are closed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vum
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Samuvel
- appellant
Jothi
- respondent
B. Ponna Rao
- other
Jothi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court