This court dismissed the second appeal filed by four appellants against a judgment in a property suit. The court accepted the counsel's request to withdraw the appeal because the parties had settled the matter out of court.
Set aside the withdrawal order; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
S.A.No.72 of 2016
1.Kuttiannan
2.Sellammal
3.Kaliannan
4.Vimala
5.Paalayee
..Appellants/Defendants 1 to 5 in Trial court Vs. 1.Kandasamy Gounder ...1st Respondent/Plaintiff 2.S.K.Kaliappan ..2nd Respondent/6th Defendant
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., to set aside the judgment and decree dated 02.06.2015 made in A.S.No.61 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sub court, Namakkal confirming the judgment and decree dated 11.07.2012 made in O.S.No.694 of 2007 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif Court, Namakkal.
The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this Second Appeal and she has also made the following endorsement: “The Appellants have instructed the counsel to withdraw the case as the matter has been settled out of court with regard to an agreement. ”
1
dsa
To
+1cc to M/s.N.Manokaran, Advocate SR.94281
+1cc to M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates, SR.94006
S.A.No.72 of 2016
CP(CO)
CB(16/12/2019)
2
Kuttiannan
Sellammal
Kaliannan
Vimala
Paalayee
Kandasamy Gounder
R. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court