V.Shanmugham v. v.Subramani
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the first appeal and set aside the lower court's judgment and decree based on a filed and admitted memorandum of compromise between the appellants and respondents 1 to 3. The compromise forms part of the decree.
What did the court decide?
First appeal allowed; judgment and decree of 29.08.2018 set aside in terms of the memorandum of compromise.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:20.06.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
A.S.No.168 of 2019 and C.M.P.Nos.6288 & 6309 of 2019
- V.Shanmugam 2. V.Rajendran 3. V.Ganesan 4. V.Mahendiran @ Perumal 5. V.Mohanasundaram 6. V.Vetrivel 7. Saraswathiammal Krishnapathiammal (died on 23.01.2019) Represented her legal heirs 8. V.Jaya 9. S.Vijay Kumar 10. S.Alagesan 11. S.Jayaprakash [Cause title accepted made in CMP.4543 of 2019 vide Court order dated 22.02.2019] ...Appellants Vs. 1. V.Subramani 2. Rukmaniammal 3. R.Siva Kumar 4. P.Palanivel 5. M.Baskar
- V.Santhanam
- K.Varathan
- P.Santhanam
- N.Pramothkumar
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the first appeal and set aside the judgment and decree based on a memorandum of compromise.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V.Shanmugam and others
- respondent
V.Subramani
- respondent
Rukmaniammal
- respondent
R.Siva Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court