Jayanthi, v. Chinnuraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC is dismissed as withdrawn. The connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.04.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
S.A.No.1395 of 2010 and
M.P.No.1 of 2010
- Jayanthi
2. Padmapriya ... Appellants
Vs.
1. Chinnuraj
2. Dr.Selvaraj
3. Govindhan
4. Ramayee
5. Sekar
6. Dr.Shanmugam ... Respondents
Prayer : Second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 19.08.2010 passed in A.S.No.9 of 2009 by the District Judge,Namakkal, confirming the decree and judgment dated 20.07.2009 passed in O.S.No.277 of 1999 by the Subordinate Judge, Namakkal.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Saravanakumar
For Respondent No.1 and 2: Mr.C.Jagadish
For respondent No.3 to 5 : Mr.G.Sunitha
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jayanthi
- appellant
Padmapriya
- respondent
Chinnuraj
- respondent
Dr. Selvaraj
- respondent
Govindhan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court