M. Kasirajan, v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Review application filed regarding an order in W.P.No.126387 of 2001. The court dismissed the review as infructuous on account of the efflux of time without adjudicating the merits.
Review application filed regarding an order in W.P.No.126387 of 2001. The court dismissed the review as infructuous on account of the efflux of time without adjudicating the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.07.2019
CORUM
THE HONOURNABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
Review Application No.60 of 2005
in
W.P.No.16387 of 2002
M.Kasirajan ..Petitioner
Vs.
1. Union of India, rep. by
the Government of Pondicherry,
through the Secretary to Government
for Labour, Chief Secretariat,
Pondicherry.
2. Commissioner of Labour,
Chief secretariat,
Pondicherry.
3. The Registrar,
Central administrative Tribunal,
Chennai bench,m
Chennai.
4. D.Azhaganandhan
5. D.Gnanaselvane
6. A.Manoharan ... Respondents
2
K.K.SASIDHARAN,J., and P.T.ASHA,J.,
vsi
Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule-I of CPC to review the
order dated 11.09.2001 in W.P.No.126387 of 2001.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Gnanasekar
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.,)
The learned counsel for the petitioner in the review application
fairly submitted that nothing survives for adjudication in view of efflux of
time.
2. The Review Application is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
(K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.) (P.T.ASHA,J.)
17.07.2019
Internet : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
vsi
Review Application No.60 of 2005
M.Kasirajan
Union of India
Commissioner of Labour
Registrar, Central administrative Tribunal
D.Azhaganandhan
D.Gnanaselvane
K.K.SASIDHARAN
P.T.ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court