Dismissed

Union of India v. the Central Administrative

Madras HC16 Jul 2019WP/1617/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, sitting as a Writ Bench, dismissed W.P.No.1617 of 2008 and the connected Municipal Petition No.1 of 2008 filed by the Union of India and other Railways officials against the Central Administrative Tribunal andEmployees due to non-prosecution by the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petition were dismissed for non-prosecution.

Union of India Vs the Central Administrative — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 16.07.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN

¶5

and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

W.P.No.1617 of 2008

and

M.P.No.1 of 2008

Union of India, rep. By its General Manager,

¶11

Southern Railway, Chennai – 600 003.

¶12

The Chief Personnel Officer,

¶13

Southern Railway, Chennai – 600 003.

¶14

The Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Tiruchirappalli Division, Tiruchirappalli.

¶15

...Appellants

¶16

-Vs-

¶17

1 The Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, rep. By its Registrar, High Court Campus, Chennai – 600 104.

¶18

2 G.Thayumanavan 3 A. Abdul Kalam 4 A.Thamilselvan 5 S.Ramakrishnan 6 R.Suresh 7 V.K.Sundar 8 N.Renuka 9 T.N.Rajkumar 10 K.Natarajan 11 D.Senthil Kumar 12 V.Dayalan 13 S.Gunasekaran 14 V.C.Jayakumar 15 P.P.Rajendran 16 G.Subramani 17 G.Shanmugam 18 M.Kalaiselvi 19 P.Velayutham ..Respondents

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

Prayer:- PETITION filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 1^st respondent Tribunal in R.A.No.21 of 2006 in O.A.No.167 of 2006 dated 08.12.2006 and quash the same and dismiss O.A.No.167 of 2006 filed before the 1^st respondent Tribunal.

¶21

For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondents: Mr.S.S.Swaminathan – R2 to R7
No appearance – R11, 12, 16, 18 & 19
Not ready notice – R8 to 10, 13 to 15
and 17
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.)
None appears for the petitioners. The Writ Petition is of
the year 2008.
2. The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also
dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Sl
TO
The Central Administrative Tribunal,
Madras Bench,
Rep by its Registrar,
High Court Campus, Chennai 600 104.
W.P.No.1617 of 2008
and
M.P.No.1 of 2008
RR(CO)
GN(22/08/2019)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Union of India v. the Central Administrative

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India v. the Central Administrative

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Kannappa Chettiyar Vs State Human Rights Commission, Tamil Nadu

V.R.Pradapkumar, Vs Union of India

R.Anurajan Vs Government of India

V.Sundararajan Vs the District Collector

The State of Tamilnadu Vs P.Siva Shanmugam

E.Saravanan Vs The Registrar General