The High Court dismissed review applications challenging the date 25.04.2017 writ order. The judges held that previous grounds were fully considered and allowed the petitions, and no new grounds for error apparent on the face of record exist.
Review applications dismissed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
REV.APLW.Nos.57 & 58 of 2018 Against
W.P.Nos.34120 & 34121 of 2015
REV.APLW.No.57 of 2018:
Vs
1. S.Stephenson 2. K.Arumugam
3. C.T.Ganesmoorthy 4. P.Venkateswaran 5. S.Rajendran
6. P.N.Balasubramanian
7. G.Chadrasekharan
8. M.Senthil Kumar
REV.APLW.Nos.57 & 58 of 2018
2
9. S.Govindaraj
10.A.Kasi
11.S.Krishnan
12.R.Rajindran
13.M.N.Sen
14.AL.Nagarajan
15.V.C.Mohana Kumar
16.A.Gopalakrishnan
17.K.P.Vijayan
18.T.John Paulraj
19.T.Chockalingam
20.P.Selvaraj 21.B.B.C.Babu
22.A.Ganesan
23.A.Arumugam
24.M.Ganesamoorthy
25.S.Murali
26.R.Mohammed Abdul Khadar
27.S.Ashok Kumar
28.P.Murugesan 29.A.R.Govindaraju
30.M.Santhanam
31.L.Subbiah
REV.APLW.Nos.57 & 58 of 2018
3
Respondents/Petitioners in WP.No.34120 of 2015
32.G.Subramanian
Respondent/Respondents in WP.No.34120 of 2015
REV.APLW.No.58 of 2018:
Respondents/Petitioners in WP.No.34121 of 2015
Respondent/Respondent in WP.No.34121 of 2015
REV.APLW.Nos.57 & 58 of 2018
4
Common Prayer: Review applications filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code praying to review the order dated 25.04.2017 in W.P.Nos.34120 and 34121 of 2015 respectively.
For Applicants(in Both Review Applications) : M/s.T.Ravi Kumar-SC
For Respondents(in Both Review Applications) : Mrs.D.Nagasaila
(Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN,J .)
These Review Applications have been filed to review the order dated
25.04.2017 in W.P.Nos.34120 and 34121 of 2015.
REV.APLW.Nos.57 & 58 of 2018
5
(K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.) (P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.) 10.04.2019
Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No vrn/pri To
The Registrar The Central Administrative Tribunal Additional City Civil Court Buildings High Court Campus Chennai – 600 104
REV.APLW.Nos.57 & 58 of 2018
6
K.K.SASIDHARAN,J. And P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.
vrn/pri
REV.APLW.Nos.57 & 58 of 2018
Against
W.P.Nos.34120 & 34121 of 2015
10.04.2019
REV.APLW.Nos.57 & 58 of 2018
3 issues framed by the court
Whether new grounds for review exist in an order that was already a result of allowing the writ petition on similar grounds.
Whether the scope of Order 47 Rule 1 CPC permits rehearing of writ petitions under the guise of a review.
Whether an error apparent on the face of record was shown to review the dated 25.04.2017 order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India
S. Stephenson
S.P. Karthikeyan
Central Administrative Tribunal
K.K. Sasidharan
P.D. Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
