The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint an arbitrator. Upon being informed that the petitioner had sought to withdraw the petition, the Court dismissed the original petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 02.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
O.P.No.314 of 2019
K.S.Baburaj .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Union of India,
Rep by the General Manager,
Southern Railway,
Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.
2.The Chief Engineer (East), Construction,
Periyar EVR High Road, Construction Complex,
Southern Railway,
Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an Arbitrator and refer all the claims arising out of the Agreement No.14/Dy.CE/CN/II/MAS/2016 dated 21.12.2016 to Arbitration. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Chandrasekaran For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Ramkumar
2
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
rsi
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement in the petition to that effect.
02.07.2019
rsi
O.P.No.314 of 2019
K.S. Baburaj
The Union of India
The Chief Engineer (East)
The Deputy Chief Engineer-II
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
