M.Rajagopal v. Mr.Sivalingam
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner sought to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of a previous order. The court accepted that the underlying order had been complied with and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The court closed the contempt petition recording that the impugned order was already complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 01.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
CONT.P.No.957 of 2019
M.Rajagopal .. Petitioner Versus Sivalingam, The Inspector of Police, Uthanapalli Police Station, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri – 635 119. .. Respondent Contempt petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for his wilful disobedience of this Court order made in W.P.No.33581 of 2018 dated 19.12.2018 under the relevant Provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kumara Devan For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate
O R D E R
This contempt petition has been filed seeking to punish
the respondent for his wilful disobedience of this Court order made in W.P.No.33581 of 2018 dated 19.12.2018 under the relevant Provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Rajagopal
- respondent
Sivalingam
Coram
Puspa Sathyanarayana
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court