Allowed

R.Vedhagiri v. M/s.R.Indira Rajkumar

Madras HC19 Jul 2019OP/239/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought probate of the last Will of the deceased R. Venkatraman. The respondents, who are the deceased's sisters, submitted consent affidavits objecting to grant. Finding the Will proved in common form, the court allowed the petition and granted probate effective in Tamil Nadu.

What did the court decide?

Grant of Probate of the Will of R. Venkatraman dated 01.07.2012, effective limited to the State of Tamil Nadu.

R.Vedhagiri Vs M/s.R.Indira Rajkumar — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION) FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2019

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶5

O.P.No. 239 of 2019

¶6

In the matter of Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925 and In the matter of Last Will and Testament of Late R.Venkatramandeceased 1. R.VEDAGIRI, S/O.LATE N.RAMACHANDRAN, FLAT 3, NEW 10, OLD NO.18, DEVANATHAN COLONY, WEST MAMBALAM, CHENNAI-600 033 ..Petitioner -vs1.M/S.R.INDIRA RAJKUMAR, W/O.RAJKUMAR, NO.6-1-118/5, PADMA RAO NAGAR, SECUNDERABAD, TELENGANA-500 025. 2. V.MALLIKA , W/O.R.VEDAGIRI, NEW NO.10, OLD NO.18, FLAT 3, DEVANATHAN COLONY, CHENNAI-600 033.

¶7

N.SUMATHI, W/O.NARAYANAN, NO.204, SR.CITIZEN CENTRE, VOLUNTARY HEALTH SERVICE, TARAMANI, CHENNAI-600 113. 4. PREMA, W/O.K.A.SHARMA, H/175, AKANKSHA DUPLEX, SAMTA-LAKSHMIPURA ROAD, VADODARA-390 023. ..Respondents

¶8

Original Petition praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to prove that the Will in Common form and that Probate thereof to have effect limited to the State of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Tamil Nadu may be granted to him.

¶9

¶10

This Original Petition coming on this day before this court for hearing the court made the following order:

¶11

The petitioner seeks issuance of Probate for the last Will and Testament of late R.Venkatraman dated 01.07.2012, who died on 13.10.2018.

¶12

said late R.Venkatraman is survived by the respondents who are his sisters. Late R.Venkatraman died issue less and his wife pre-deceased him. Hence, his sisters being Class-II heirs would have inherited the property in the absence of Will.

¶13

The respondents 1 to 4 who are the sisters of testator have given their consent affidavits expressing their no objection for grant of Probate. The said consent affidavits have been marked as Ex.P5 to Ex.P8. The death certificate of late R.Venkatraman has been marked as Ex.P1 and the original Will has been marked as Ex.P2. The death certificate of Vijayalakshmi, wife of R.Venkatraman has been marked as Ex.P3.

¶14

the testator and its attestation by himself and one Dr.R.Venkatasubramanian.

¶15

From the above evidence, I find that the petitioner has proved the Will in common form and is entitled to Probate.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

¶18

In fine, this Original Petition is allowed granting Probate in respect of the Will of R.Venkatraman dated 01.07.2012.

¶19

//Certified to be a true copy//
Dated this the day of 2019.
SU/14.08.2019 COURT OFFICER
From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of
the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Vedhagiri v. M/s.R.Indira Rajkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Vedhagiri v. M/s.R.Indira Rajkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mannan Kumar R Jain Vs No Respondent

Mrs. M.G. Helen., and 2 others Vs M/s Servocraft Hr Solutions

Will (10) of Vs Mrs.Mythili Srinivasan

N.Palaniappan Vs No Respondent

R.Parvathy Vs No Respondent

Mrs.D.Ambiga and Another Vs no respondent