M/S.Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd. v. M/S.Jai Mahalakshmi Exports Rep.by Its Prop Mr.Divesh Jadavji Rupapel
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2019 and A.No.3374 of 2019 PUSHPA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
O.A.No.465 of 2019 and A.No.3374 of 2019
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
These applications have been filed seeking to restrain the Garnishee/fourth Respondent from making any payment up to a sum of Rs.10,52,092/- to the respondents 1 to 3 herein and to direct the garnishee/fourth respondent to deposit the said amount before this Court.
verification, they came to know that there is some amount due and payable by the garnishee/fourth respondent to the respondents 1 to 3 herein.
injunction restraining the fourth respondent from making any payment from the receivables to the respondents 1 to 3. Pursuant to the said order, if any money is in the hands of the garnishee/fourth respondent, the same may be deposited into Court to the tune of Rs.10,52,092/within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
05.07.2019
2
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
rsi
O.A.No.465 of 2019
and
A.No.3374 of 2019
05.07.2019
Pushpa Sathyanarayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court