R.Jamuna v. a.Saravanan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The court accepted that the respondent had complied with the prior order and closed the petition without further observation.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed as the respondent has complied with the earlier order.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.07.2019
Coram
The Honourable Mrs. Justice PUSPA SATHYANARAYANA
Contempt Petition No.866 of 2019
IN
W.P.NO.567 OF 2019
R.Jamuna ... Petitioner
Vs.
A.Saravanan ... Respondent
Petition filed under Section 11 of contempt of
Court Act, 1971 to punish the respondent herein for
wilful disobedience of the order dated 09.01.2019 in
W.P.No.567 of 2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Magesh Kumar
For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai
Government Advocate
ORDER
Learned Government Advocate appearing for the
respondent submits that the order dated 09.01.2019 passed
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ by this Court has been complied with.
2
Recording the same, the contempt petition is closed.
SD/-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Jamuna
- respondent
A.Saravanan
Coram
**Justice PUSPA SATHYANARAYANA**
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court