Allowed
M/S. Maya Appliances P L v. Elica Pb India P L
Madras HCOA/1147/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a suit for design infringement, the court made absolute an earlier order directing the respondent to file monthly statements of accounts for sales of infringing products and permitting the applicant to comply with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC, effectively closing the interlocutory applications.
What did the court decide?
Writ applications and applications connected thereto are closed; previous order for monthly accounts and compliance with CPC Rule 3 is made absolute.