S.Manoharan v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
Habeas Corpus petition filed under Article 226 for the release of a detenu was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
H.C.P.No.519/2019
S.Manoharan ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Police
Neelankarai Range, Chennai 600 115.
2.The Inspector of Police
J8 Neelankarai Police Station
Chennai 600 115.
3.Chandru ...Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus directing the 2nd respondent to secure and produce the detenu namely M.Divya, daughter of Manoharan, aged about 19 years before this Court and from illegal custody of the 3rd respondent and set her at liberty.
For Petitioner .. Mr.A.Karthikeyan For RR 1 & 2 .. Mr.C.Iyyappa Raj, APP
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Manoharan
- respondent
Assistant Commissioner of Police, Neelankarai Range, Chennai
- respondent
Inspector of Police, J8 Neelankarai Police Station, Chennai
- respondent
Chandru
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court