Disposed

Veeramani, Aged 18 Years, v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC12 Sept 2019HCP/1956/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a habeas corpus petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition sought the production and release of a detenu. Upon noting suspicious circumstances regarding the detenu's vehicle and the missing persons involved, the court directed the transfer of investigation. The petition was then disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Disposed with a direction to the Superintendent of Police to transfer the investigation to the Deputy Superintendent of Police and monitor it.

Veeramani, Aged 18 Years, Vs the… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 12.09.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN

¶5

H.C.P. No. 1956 of 2018

¶6

Veeramani ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Tiruvannamalai District,
Tiruvannamalai.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Polur Town,
Tiruvannamalai District.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Jamunamathur Police Station,
Jamunamathur,
Tiruvannamalai District. ... Respondents

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the detenu Mr.Tirupathi, S/o. Kannan, aged 41 years, residing at Veerapanur Village, Jamunamathur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District and set him at liberty.

¶8

Seeking a direction to the respondents to produce the detenu Mr.Tirupathi, S/o. Kannan, aged 41 years and set him at liberty, the present Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed.

¶9

From the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, it appears that the detenu's vehicle was reportedly taken away by two persons, which was recorded by the CCTV.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

Strangely, these two persons are also missing. Therefore, the needle of suspicion points out to them.

¶12

Thus, we direct the first respondent to entrust the investigation to the second respondent. The first respondent shall also monitor and supervise the investigation.

¶13

In such view of the matter, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands disposed of. As and when the detenu is secured, he should be produced before the jurisdictional Magistrate.

¶14

mmi/ssm

¶15

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Tiruvannamalai District,
Tiruvannamalai.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Polur Town, Tiruvannamalai District.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Jamunamathur Police Station,
Jamunamathur, Tiruvannamalai District.
4.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
H.C.P. No. 1956 of 2018

¶16

Kak(18/10/2019)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Veeramani, Aged 18 Years, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veeramani, Aged 18 Years, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thiru.T.Vadivel, M/Aged About Vs the State Rep by

S.Karpagam, Vs the State Rep by Its

Vedhanayagam Paul Theodre, Vs the State Rep by Its

P. Lokesh Kumar Vs Saraswathi @ Nagalakshmi

Smt.K.Ambika, M/40 Years Vs the Commissioner of Police

G.Bhavani, 29 Years, Vs the Commissioner of Police